Skip to main content
search
An alleged unlawful finalisation of a request for Ministerial Intervention gives the Court jurisdiction to prevent a non-citizen’s removal: Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs v MZAPC [2024] FCAFC 34 australian resident visaJudicial Review

An alleged unlawful finalisation of a request for Ministerial Intervention gives the Court jurisdiction to prevent a non-citizen’s removal: Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs v MZAPC [2024] FCAFC 34

Where a non-citizen initiates judicial review proceedings alleging that their request for Ministerial Intervention has been finalised or determined unlawfully, can a Court make an order preventing their removal under s 198 of the Migration Act 1958 until their application is finally determined? Legal Background In the 2023 decision of Davis v Minister for Immigration the High Court determined that…
Joel McComber
21 March, 2024
Accommodation of cognitive impairments in Tribunal proceedings: NDBR v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 168 australian resident visaJudicial ReviewProtection Visas

Accommodation of cognitive impairments in Tribunal proceedings: NDBR v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 168

Does a failure of the Tribunal to make accommodations for a cognitively impaired applicant recommended by a neuropsychologist amount to a denial of procedural fairness? Brief summary In this case, the Minister refused to grant the applicant a Temporary Protection visa under s 501(1) of the Migration Act 1958. The applicant applied to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) for review…
Joel McComber
7 March, 2024
The application of the GTE criterion for Student Visas: Kumar v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCAFC 16 australian resident visaJudicial ReviewStudent

The application of the GTE criterion for Student Visas: Kumar v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCAFC 16

The issue for consideration in Kumar v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection FCAFC 16 was whether a decision-maker, deciding whether an applicant for a student visa intends genuinely to stay in Australia temporarily, have to make express findings in relation to all matters prescribed by Ministerial Direction 69 — Assessing the genuine temporary entrant criterion for student visa and…
Joel McComber
18 February, 2024
What can I do if the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia has dismissed my judicial review application for non-appearance? australian resident visaJudicial ReviewVisa refusal AAT

What can I do if the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia has dismissed my judicial review application for non-appearance?

Most applications for judicial review of migration decisions – other than those made in relation to ‘character-related’ cancellations and refusals - are decided by Division 2 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Circuit Court). Importantly, the Circuit Court’s Rules allow the Court to dismiss a judicial review application immediately and without notice if an applicant fails to…
Joel McComber
14 February, 2024
Putting cases in the ‘deep freeze’: Okoh v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FedCFamC2G 209 australian resident visaJudicial ReviewVisa refusal AAT

Putting cases in the ‘deep freeze’: Okoh v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FedCFamC2G 209

The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) can and should adjourn applications where the outcome is dependent on some related process being undertaken in accordance with the Migration Act. Brief summary In this case, a family of secondary applicants for a permanent visa applied to the AAT for review of a refusal decision after the primary applicant’s application was automatically refused under…
Joel McComber
6 February, 2024
Evidence is important: Tikomaimaleya v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCAFC 199 australian resident visaCancellationCharacter testJudicial Review

Evidence is important: Tikomaimaleya v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCAFC 199

The role of evidence, and providing evidence in support of submissions, is crucial in migration-related processes, including visa applications and cancellations. Brief Summary In this case, the Minister refused to revoke the mandatory cancellation of the Appellant’s visa under s 501CA of the Migration Act. One of the central bases on which the Appellant had sought revocation was because he…
Joel McComber
29 January, 2024
The end of indefinite immigration detention in Australia: NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] HCA 37 australian resident visaCancellationJudicial Review

The end of indefinite immigration detention in Australia: NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] HCA 37

On 8 November 2023, the High Court of Australia’s recently elevated Chief Justice made a brief order dismantling one of the most controversial principles in Australian immigration law for the last two decades: That non-citizens who had been denied entry to the Australian community but who could not be removed to any other country could be lawfully detained indefinitely (NZYQ).…
Joel McComber
22 January, 2024
Judicial Review of Visa/Nomination Refusal Decisions made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal reviewJudicial ReviewVisa refusal AAT

Judicial Review of Visa/Nomination Refusal Decisions made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal

Note, this post does not relate to decisions made by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal or Minister for Immigration relating to the cancellation or refusal of visas on ‘character grounds’ under s 501 of the Migration Act. If the Tribunal has affirmed a decision to cancel or refuse a visa on ‘character grounds’, or affirmed a decision not to revoke the…
Joel McComber
26 June, 2023
Judicial review of migration decisions in Australia reviewJudicial Review

Judicial review of migration decisions in Australia

Judicial review is often described as the option of last resort for people experiencing difficulties on their pathway to migrating to, or remaining in, Australia. But what is it? Judicial review is the process by which Courts ensure that decisions made under the Migration Act by the Minister or the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) are made ‘according to law.’ If…
Joel McComber
6 June, 2023